Document Type

Thesis

Date of Award

5-31-1992

Degree Name

Master of Science in Environmental Science - (M.S.)

Department

Chemical Engineering, Chemistry and Environmental Science

First Advisor

Leonard Dauerman

Second Advisor

John R. Schuring

Third Advisor

Richard B. Trattner

Abstract

Pilot plant studies have been carried out on a process for the remediation of soils contaminated with volatile organics (VOCs) and semi-volatile organics (SVOCs) by microwave-assisted steam distillation that had been developed in benchscale studies. The major concern had been that the process is based upon the use of electrical energy, and thus could not be competitive with fossil fuel based technologies like incineration. That concern was addressed in the pilot plant studies.

A pilot plant rated at 6 kW power and a cavity of approximately 60 cubic feet was used. In studies carried out on a water load it was found that the incident power was 4.3 kW. In those studies, the distribution of energy within the cavity was also studied.

Substrates studied were sand and soil, respectively. The total weights of the subtrates were in the 40-50 lb range. The substrates were impregnated with naphthalene. It was found that the remediation costs were of the order of $4/ton to effect 100% remediation. Even if total power operating costs are taken into consideration, the cost is less than $15/ton. That's an exceedingly low number. For incineration, costs are in the $200-$300/ton range, plus the ash problem and the public's dislike of incineration processes.

The costs obtained in this study cannot be considered as a basis for making comparisons to existing processes. Comparable costs can only be obtained from field testing, now in the planning stage. Their significance is that it does not appear to be the case that the microwave process is prohibitively expensive because of the cost of electric power.

Other studies in the thesis related to analytical procedures: it was concluded that ultrasonic extraction was preferrable to Soxhlet extraction; also, normal needle injection into the GC/MS was as effective as hot needle injection.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.