Conceptuality and practical action: A critique of charles taylor's verstehen social theory
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2010
Abstract
In their recent debate, Hubert Dreyfus rejects John McDowell's claim that perception is permeated with "mindedness" and argues instead that ordinary embodied coping is largely "nonconceptual." This argument has important, yet largely unacknowledged consequences for normative social theory, which this article demonstrates through a critique of Charles Taylor's Verstehen thesis. If Dreyfus is right that "the enemy of expertise is thought," then Taylor is denied his defense against charges of relativism, which is that maximizing the interpretive clarity of social practices unequivocally makes for better practices. Verstehen social theory, I argue, must consider both the gains and losses of the attempt to make the meaning of our practices explicit. © The Author(s) 2010.
Identifier
77649251980 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393109350841
e-ISSN
15527441
ISSN
00483931
First Page
59
Last Page
83
Issue
1
Volume
40
Recommended Citation
Brownstein, Michael, "Conceptuality and practical action: A critique of charles taylor's verstehen social theory" (2010). Faculty Publications. 6364.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/6364
