The relationships among sex-role orientation, cognitive complexity, and tolerance for ambiguity
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-1-1982
Abstract
Two hundred and four female and eighty-seven male college students completed the Schroder and Streufert measure of cognitive complexity, Budner's Intolerance for Ambiguity Scale, and Bem's Sex Role Inventory (BSRI). It was hypothesized that subjects classified as androgynous and as cross-sexed would be more cognitively complex and more tolerant of ambiguity than sex-typed or undifferentiated subjects; and cognitive complexity and intolerance for ambiguity would be negatively correlated. The data indicated that male and female androgynous and cross-sexed subjects were more tolerant of ambiguity than sex-typed subjects and cognitively more complex than undifferentiated subjects. Cross-sexed subjects were more cognitively complex than sex-typed subjects. Cognitive complexity and intolerance for ambiguity were negatively correlated. The BSRI had differential power to predict cognitive complexity depending upon sex of subject. © 1982 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
Identifier
0011581618 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Sex Roles
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287947
e-ISSN
15732762
ISSN
03600025
First Page
1209
Last Page
1220
Issue
12
Volume
8
Recommended Citation
Rotter, Naomi G. and O'Connell, Agnes N., "The relationships among sex-role orientation, cognitive complexity, and tolerance for ambiguity" (1982). Faculty Publications. 21330.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/21330
