Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of office design
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2005
Abstract
This article suggests that the analysis of physical environments in organizations should recognize three separate dimensions: instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism. A theoretical framework is presented based on an expansive survey of multiple bodies of literature that study the effects of physical environments of organizations. Two different methodologies are employed to study employee perceptions of the physical environment of their office space and to test and support the three-dimension framework. In a qualitative study, narratives of in-depth interviews relating to office design are evaluated. In a quantitative study, data collected in a survey of 148 office employees provide evidence for the construct validity of three separate dimensions. The three-dimension model described and validated in this study may facilitate the planning and evaluation of office design. © 2005 Sage Publications.
Identifier
21544468006 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Environment and Behavior
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916504270695
ISSN
00139165
First Page
533
Last Page
551
Issue
4
Volume
37
Recommended Citation
Vilnai-Yavetz, Iris; Rafaeli, Anat; and Yaacov, Caryn Schneider, "Instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolism of office design" (2005). Faculty Publications. 19644.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/19644
