Assessing Self-Appraisal of Job Performance as an Evaluation Device: Are the Poor Results a Function of Method or Methodology?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-1991
Abstract
Self-appraised job performance was studied in relation to supervisory ratings under those conditions in which self-evaluation is most likely to predict performance outcomes (Mabe & West, 1982). In contrast to previous research, there was no evidence of leniency error or restriction of range in self-appraised job performance. Convergence between self- and supervisory ratings was also evident, and was interpreted in light of the presence of halo error. © 1991, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
Identifier
84973743842 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Human Relations
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679104401004
e-ISSN
1741282X
ISSN
00187267
First Page
1081
Last Page
1091
Issue
10
Volume
44
Recommended Citation
Somers, Mark John and Birnbaum, Dee, "Assessing Self-Appraisal of Job Performance as an Evaluation Device: Are the Poor Results a Function of Method or Methodology?" (1991). Faculty Publications. 17632.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/17632