Communication Differences in Virtual Design Teams: Findings from a Multi-Method Analysis of High and Low Performing Experimental Teams
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-31-2008
Abstract
This multi-method study distinguishes between four high performing and four low performing fully distributed virtual design teams, through an analysis of their asynchronous communication. Results indicate that these teams were similar in terms of the number of messages exchanged, the amount of communication devoted to aspects of design, and the amount and proportion of communication spent on team coordination, supportive commentary, and “other” topics. However, high performing teams were more verbose-they communicated more words. They also spent less time in brainstorming activities. Rather, high performing teams engaged in more critical commentary and active debate, compared to low performing teams. High performing teams conducted more in-depth discussions in the form of argumentation, as ideas were developed through an interactive debate of the pros and cons of issues. This debate resulted in the need for summaries, which served a dual role as they became intermediate steps in the process of writing the report deliverable. © 2008, Authors. All rights reserved.
Identifier
85002551109 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Data Base for Advances in Information Systems
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1145/1341971.1341977
ISSN
00950033
First Page
51
Last Page
67
Issue
1
Volume
39
Recommended Citation
Ocker, Rosalie J. and Fjermestad, Jerry, "Communication Differences in Virtual Design Teams: Findings from a Multi-Method Analysis of High and Low Performing Experimental Teams" (2008). Faculty Publications. 12895.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/12895
