Predictors of responses to organizational wrongdoing: A study of intentions of management accountants
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
8-1-2008
Abstract
It has been proposed that employees aware of organizational wrong-doing face two decisions: whether or not to blow the whistle and whether or not to leave their organizations. Of these only the decision to blow the whistle has received attention, leaving a gap in knowledge; thus, a survey of 330 management accountants was analyzed to examine potential predictors of intended responses to organizational wrongdoing. Analysis of ratings indicated that intent to leave increased with seriousness of wrongdoing and expected retaliation for whistleblowing and decreased with expected effectiveness of whistleblowing. Intent to stay and blow the whistle increased with expected effectiveness of whistleblowing and role responsibility for reporting and decreased with expected retaliation for whistleblowing; intent to leave and blow the whistle increased with expected effectiveness of whistleblowing and role responsibility for reporting. © Psychological Reports 2008.
Identifier
54849421566 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Psychological Reports
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.103.1.121-133
e-ISSN
1558691X
ISSN
00332941
PubMed ID
18982945
First Page
121
Last Page
133
Issue
1
Volume
103
Recommended Citation
Casal, Jose C. and Bogui, Frederic B., "Predictors of responses to organizational wrongdoing: A study of intentions of management accountants" (2008). Faculty Publications. 12737.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/12737
