Type of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: Further evidence that type of wrongdoing affects the whistle-blowing process
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Abstract
Preliminary evidence suggests that the type of wrongdoing observed in organizations affects the whistle-blowing process; that is, the likelihood that wrongdoing will be reported and the consequences of so doing. Using as sample of management accountants and focusing on financial fraud, this study provides additional evidence that type of wrongdoing affects the likelihood of whistleblowing. However, contrary to previous research findings, there was no relationship between type of wrongdoing and experienced retaliation for whistleblowing. Type of wrongdoing was related to perceived issue seriousness providing additional evidence that wrongdoing is not monolithic in nature. These findings suggest that type of wrongdoing should be included in future research on the topic of whistle-blowing.
Identifier
84865416393 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Public Personnel Management
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1177/009102601104000205
ISSN
00910260
First Page
151
Last Page
163
Issue
2
Volume
40
Recommended Citation
Somers, Mark and Casal, Jose C., "Type of wrongdoing and whistle-blowing: Further evidence that type of wrongdoing affects the whistle-blowing process" (2011). Faculty Publications. 11485.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/11485
