Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Use: the Role of Perceived Advantages

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-1-2017

Abstract

This article analyzes some of the reasons people choose e-participation over traditional involvement forums as a way of having public policy input. The research aimed to see whether people perceived that e-participation has time, cost, quality, and transparency advantages over traditional participation channels which some researchers have suggested is the case. The study also wanted to investigate whether perceiving one or more of these advantages has an impact on whether a person uses e-participation. Using data from the 2012 EU eGovernment Benchmark-User survey we found that people who perceive these advantages are more likely to use e-participation but the various advantages have different impacts. Saving time has the strongest impact on use. Perceiving quality and transparency advantages also impacts use, but a perceived cost advantage does not. In addition, we found that people are more likely to use e-participation if they are satisfied with a jurisdiction’s website and application design. These findings have implications for how governments should design and market websites if they want to increase e-participation.

Identifier

84965075970 (Scopus)

Publication Title

Public Organization Review

External Full Text Location

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0346-2

e-ISSN

15737098

ISSN

15667170

First Page

409

Last Page

428

Issue

3

Volume

17

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS