The future of the impact agenda depends on the revaluation of academic freedom

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2017

Abstract

Opponents of the impact agenda often base their arguments on the claim that requiring scholarly research to demonstrate broader societal impacts conflicts with academic freedom. This paper argues that this claim entails a narrow interpretation of academic freedom as freedom from interference. A richer interpretation is proposed of academic freedom as freedom to pursue research that may have broader impacts. Adopting a positive view of academic freedom will require disciplines to adjust their standards of academic rigor and universities to amend their criteria for promotion and tenure. It will also provide the foundation for an academic response to the rise of neopopulism.

Identifier

85051717844 (Scopus)

Publication Title

Palgrave Communications

External Full Text Location

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0041-0

e-ISSN

20551045

Issue

1

Volume

3

Grant

1445121

Fund Ref

National Science Foundation

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS