Was the Deepwater Horizon Well Discharge Churn Flow? Implications on the Estimation of the Oil Discharge and Droplet Size Distribution
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-16-2018
Abstract
Improved understanding of the character of an uncontrolled pipeline flow is critical for the estimation of the oil discharge and droplet size distribution both essential for evaluating oil spill impact. Measured oil and gas properties at the wellhead of the Macondo255 and detailed numerical modeling suggested that the flow within the pipe could have been “churn,” whereby oil and gas tumble violently within the pipe and is different from the bubbly flow commonly assumed for that release. The churn flow would have produced 5 times the energy loss in the pipe compared to bubbly flow, and its plume would have entrained 35% more water than that of the bubbly flow. Both findings suggest that the oil discharge in Deepwater Horizon could have been overestimated, by up to 200%. The resulting oil droplet size distribution of churn flow is likely smaller than that of bubbly flow.
Identifier
85043400371 (Scopus)
Publication Title
Geophysical Research Letters
External Full Text Location
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076606
e-ISSN
19448007
ISSN
00948276
First Page
2396
Last Page
2403
Issue
5
Volume
45
Fund Ref
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Recommended Citation
Boufadel, Michel C.; Gao, Feng; Zhao, Lin; Özgökmen, Tamay; Miller, Richard; King, Thomas; Robinson, Brian; Lee, Kenneth; and Leifer, Ira, "Was the Deepwater Horizon Well Discharge Churn Flow? Implications on the Estimation of the Oil Discharge and Droplet Size Distribution" (2018). Faculty Publications. 8780.
https://digitalcommons.njit.edu/fac_pubs/8780
